Jump to content

Sponsors

valetudo8080

AB V.I.P. Member
  • Posts

    481
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by valetudo8080

  1. I thought it would be fun to start a thread solely dedicated to the asshole things that I could see our resident asshole doing....

     

     

    I think Bigfoot is the kind of guy that would send you a birthday card with a gift card inside, and when you went to redeem that card, you find out it has a $0.00 balance.

     

    That is funny and pretty shitty...but it also gave me a few new gift ideas for my little cousins ...ha

  2. UPDATE......use google Chrome.....internet explorer isnt working for OLM.........so everyone here that loves OLM can get back on.....and for everyone who hates that board......just keep using internet explorer:cool::cool::cool:

  3. Solid pic......i would do more pull-ups to add width.......you are already pretty thick....just need a bit more detail.

     

    i have been using cables from all angles to hammer my back and the constant tension of the cables allows me to feel the fibers contracting and therefore i am adding details that werent there before

  4. Regular.....no offense but that is the most well typed out post on a AAS message board i have ever seen:cool:

     

    Carry on....i just wanted to mention that my friend....your college English Professor would be proud:eek:

     

    I spend most of my time on the boards solving complicated problems and determining the validity of information. In an effort to remain objective and fair, I use the growing list below to evaluate test results, good or bad.

     

    The credibility of testing results are limited by:

    • The party who supplied the product to be tested.

    • The party who submitted the product for testing.

    • The party conducting the test.

    • The method used to test the product.

    • The skill set of the party conducting the test.

    • The party taking receipt of and announcing the results.

    • Any perception of bias.

    • Opportunities to tamper with the sample, test, or test results.

    • Gaps in the chain of custody.

     

    Evidence that is outside of people's expectations gets more attention from everyone. All products being tested and all of the results being posted would be desirable. However, the point of my post is that there are limitations to test results, good or bad. Due to the limitations presented in my earlier posts, test results typically have the weight of claims and are treated as claims instead of hard evidence.

     

    It's not my intention to make you feel attacked and if I made you feel that way, I apologize. If there is any part of the evaluation I posted that you feel is unfair or incorrect, by all means, say so.

     

    As to your opinion that posting test results is a "no win" situation, the goal of testing products shouldn't be to win. The goal should be to create evidence in an effort to discover the truth and you have done just that.

     

    The evidence you presented indicates that the person who purchased the bottle that was tested received less than what they paid for. That result is leading some to the wider conclusion that all of the products strango sells are being intentionally misrepresented, which is pre-mature. Before a judgment can be made or some form of vendor intervention can take place, the evidence being used to arrive at the conclusion something malicious could be occurring must be analyzed.

     

    I feel you're being honest. You presented some testing results that everyone should see. However, you've indicated you feel there is a typo in the most critical area of the results. All of the evaluative points listed above pertaining to the lab and lab staff, are unverifiable. There is also some concern from other people participating in this thread that the interpretation of the results may be incorrect. Taking action against someone based upon evidence which is believed to contain an error is inappropriate.

     

     

     

     

    I have reviewed the certificate of analysis and HPLC test strango ordered. The result indicates the Primo is about 99.5% pure. I requested that Strango not post the certificate of analysis or give it to clients because parts of the test can't be translated and the test itself contains metadata. The benefit is not worth the security risk. I am able to see the source of the testing data but I am unable to verify the authenticity test itself.

     

     

     

    What board do you staff and what is your name on that board?

     

    Please explain why you have seven accounts here. Do you prefer to be called cedarhills, lovejoy, nwportland, nwportlandor, oxyfast, portland, or weinerdog?

  5. Observation.....there are a lot of guys on here that like giving a girl the Dirty Sanchez.....I can proudly say I am one of the few that does not have a raging E. Coli infection from doing that disgusting stuff. You lick her pooper, you pay the price.

     

    Oh and Valetudo, I am ashamed of you....Wanderlei, one of my all-time fave fighters....would never give a girl the Dirty Sanchez....you are letting your hero down man. :mad:

     

    DBPress.....you are under the assumption the Wanderlei does not eat ass himself.........he is a true warrior and enjoys all the spoils of victory I bet.

     

    And with him being Brazilian and all with of the fat asses/assholes in Brazil I am sure his tongue has touched an out-of-this-world Brazilian brown-eye at least once in his hopefully long and prosperous life so far:p

×
×
  • Create New...