MIA10

Shit lips stink ships.

A certain someone's (^^^^^) tren ace is the base of all my cutting/recomp cycles now. High quality tren + proper diet and training alone do incredible things. My personal recommendation if you want to add an oral is var. Don't know the physiology/pharmacology behind why, but it seems to melt away abdominal fat unlike anything else. It also (for me at least) has a slight appetite and craving suppressing quality, but doesn't totally crush all desire to eat like anadrol.

Not sure I understand the OP...he was asking for your name and address to verify if he had worked with you in the past and you weren't just someone who had happened to find his email?

I'll strongly echo what everyone else has said. The quality and consistency since the reorganization a few months ago is still what it was before, if not improved (if that's possible to imagine). The man's tren ace remains a game-changer like no other.

My advice: don't fixate on ketosis. Keep your protein high, calories low, and don't sweat the rest. Dieting is mentally tough enough as it is without having to avoid entire macronutrients and giant sets of food groups. As long the mirror and way your pants fit are telling the right story, have faith that what you're doing is working. FWIW, I used to be big into keto-style dieting too.

I recommend you take a look at an article by Lyle McDonald (he's written entire books on this and related topic too): "...Ketones are protein sparing but only when dietary protein intake is inadequate in the first place. When protein is set appropriately (e.g. 1-1.5 g/lb lean body mass), the development of ketosis isn’t that critical to spare protein. Simply, protein is the most protein sparing nutrient and other things (e.g. ketones vs. carbohydrates) only matter if protein is inadequate in the first place." http://www.bodyrecomposition.com/nutrition/ketosis-and-the-ketogenic-ratio-qa.html

My KISS approach to dieting is:

(1) Get adequate protein

(2) Restrict total calories as low as is possible

(3) Continue to lift with intensity

(4) Run tren. Lots of tren. ;)

(5) Refeed about once per week to maintain sanity and avoid becoming a miserable d!ck due to 1-4. Also to re-regulate the various hormonal signals that go haywire in prolonged dieting - leptin, ghrelin, cortisol, etc

Let's all be real honest with ourselves here. For most of us, at least, I think it would take MULTIPLE tests of product from a single source sent in to different labs from different bros (all without any questionable intentions or any ties to that source), all coming back with the same result before a source was ever definitively blessed or damned. Even then, there would probably be the stalwart haters or lovers.

If you were already inclined to think sourceX is a golden, you're probably going to find a way to claim primo coming back as eq (or insert whatever contents donot= label) was due to flawed testing. If you think he's a fraud and primo comes back primo, the tester is working for the source. You'll come up with similar arguments in reverse. Dos palabras amigos: Confirmation. Bias.

There's that old saying "trust your source" - which most people tend to do. Not so much because it's the rational thing, but because unless you are frequently sending off product to get tested yourself and have near-total personal control over the testing process, YOU DON'T HAVE MUCH OTHER CHOICE. Claims of testing - hell, probably even copies of the paperwork associated - can be faked.

That said, I'm very much in support of the future plans to test by many of the other brothers here. At the very least it should help scare some dishonest sources straight for a little while. Just that personally, this thread has done nothing to change my mind about the sources I would/wouldn't do business with. Which is a shame for 70 pgs of debate!

Lol it's too bad threads like this don't spike 60 pages of comments.

Hey bros, I was hesitant to make this post but as 2014 is right around the corner I think the time is right to make this new year all about seeing changes in the ug sex trade world. The results we have found are shocking and disappointing to say the least. So many of us are loyal customers to some of our favorite sources putting 100% trust in their sluts without really knowing if they are giving us the 100% trust we demand from them. The reason I decided now is the time to test several supposedly GOLDEN sources is to keep honest people honest. So many of us hear so and so has the best ______ on the planet but nobody is testing the ______ to know for certain the curtains match the drapes.

Rai is guilty. Of _________________.

Please do not pm me asking me who the other ________ were as I will not answer until more testing is done.

*sits back and waits for 60pgs of speculation*

Has anyone considered that the testing lab itself might have, let's just say, a "vested" interest in discovering a large proportion of fakes in the samples sent from a tester? Think this through for a second - company offers one set of products - steroid test kits. What is more likely to result in them selling additional tests to a customer and/or the people he talks to about the results: (A) telling the customer all of the products he sent in are 100% safe and he can sleep soundly at night or (2) a couple were the real deal but OH SHIT look at all these things you're paying money to inject into your body that aren't what you think they are (better find out about everything else that's now in question, huh? HUH?)

Just another conspiracy theory for your consideration. But for the record I think MU's regarding a lab trying to create negative gossip about their competitors is far more likely. :cool:

If we would stop being so egocentric, we'd see the two boards aren't that different. Both are founded on the belief in the power of creating a community, one where knowledge and experience of each is shared for everyone's benefit. Granted, each have their own type of governance and rules - which you can choose to abide by or not and risk banning (whether rules are rational or not and worth abiding by is up to personal interpretation, much like laws). This board has some great guys whose posts I continually benefit from reading, likewise so does that board, and each has members who are not active members of the other board. Generally, on each, I try to take what I can use and leave what I can't (or what's just unproductive, petty, or bickering). Jeet Kune Do.

As for Strang - everyone's taking shots, but if you're kicking the man while he's down, when he's back on top don't come a-praisin his name. Sure, he got caught in a bad situation - but he owned up and was straightforward about what happened from the beginning. And since, from what I've seen he's filled the orders he had out. Think about how many past sources have gotten into a situation and instead of making it right, just bailed with everyone's money and were never heard from again (or waited it out and created a new handle months later). Better or worse, the man is standing by his name, and I think that says a lot about him.

Give him a break Ben. He's new and trying to do good :)

Exactly. Ironic I should come from the "how this board is head and shoulders above GH15" thread into this one. Judge the intent, not the outcome. Obviously wasn't malicious, just misguided - and he would probably happily benefit from a vet's proper guidance.

But I'll probably be shouted down for recommending how vets should act when I have like 10 posts. :cool:

i spoke with him two days ago....hes rolling just really really backed up. the hgh market is getting more and more sketchy all the time so i think hes getting more and more business and its slowing him down a bit.

Sure enough, the man got back to me. Everything's sorted perfectly. There's a reason HK has a rep that he'll always come through in the end.

He is but Sandy slowed things up actually put a stop to things for about 2 to 3 weeks and now all is rolling again.

 

I'm in contact with him quite often and can say things just got rolling again this week.

 

So keep in mind all this means he is most likely backed up pretty good because of the layoff period.

SF, have you spoken to him this week? I've been trying to get in touch for a while with no luck. If you can help me out, please PM.

Recommending EPO to steroid users who, inherently, are already likely to have an above average RBC, is just reckless.

Safe travels brother - have a couple brews for your friends at AB!

Let us know how that goes.

I'd be suspecting a set up with Johnny Law...

Thanks for the warning, man. Hadn't really considered it.

I had been in contact with him on and off (at least once a month), so it's not like he emailed out of the blue. Still, sounds like maybe it's smarter to drop it now.

Mack supposedly died a yr ago or so.

Yes, you are correct. He was replaced by "Mack2" - that's who I was referring to, since the earlier conversation had been about Mack2.

Believe it or not, Mack got in contact w/ me today about a refund for a package ordered in December...

I don't really think he was a scammer, just had some personal stuff go on and left his biz in the hands of some backups who couldn't handle it.